Difference between revisions of "Maxwell's equations"

From ONELAB
Jump to: navigation, search
(Constitutive laws)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
fields $\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ are called the magnetic
 
fields $\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ are called the magnetic
 
field, the electric field, the magnetic flux density and the electric flux
 
field, the electric field, the magnetic flux density and the electric flux
density. Taken together, they form a mathematical representation of the same
+
density<ref>Many different names are used to denote these four vector fields (see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field). We tend to use ''magnetic flux density'' and ''magnetic induction'' indifferently for $\vec{b}$. We also use ''electric flux density'' and ''electric displacement field'' indifferently for $\vec{d}$.</ref>. Taken together, they form a mathematical representation of the same
 
physical phenomenon: the electromagnetic field. To close the system, the following  
 
physical phenomenon: the electromagnetic field. To close the system, the following  
 
constitutive relations are added, which relate the magnetic  
 
constitutive relations are added, which relate the magnetic  
Line 20: Line 20:
 
\vec{d} &= \epsilon_0 \vec{e} + \vec{p} \label{eq:dep} .
 
\vec{d} &= \epsilon_0 \vec{e} + \vec{p} \label{eq:dep} .
 
\end{align}
 
\end{align}
 
If your memory of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus vector analysis] is bit foggy, now is a good time to freshen up as you will need at least a basic understanding of the gradient, divergence and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curl_%28mathematics%29 curl] operators to understand the electromagnetic tutorials.
 
 
 
The electric charge density $\rho$, the current density $\vec{j}$, the
 
The electric charge density $\rho$, the current density $\vec{j}$, the
 
magnetization $\vec{m}$ and the electric polarization $\vec{p}$ are the
 
magnetization $\vec{m}$ and the electric polarization $\vec{p}$ are the
Line 29: Line 26:
 
instant $t=t_0$, the system \eqref{eq:ampere}&ndash;\eqref{eq:dep} determines
 
instant $t=t_0$, the system \eqref{eq:ampere}&ndash;\eqref{eq:dep} determines
 
$\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ for any other time instant $t$.
 
$\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ for any other time instant $t$.
 
 
Note that \eqref{eq:gausse} implies, by \eqref{eq:ampere}, the
 
Note that \eqref{eq:gausse} implies, by \eqref{eq:ampere}, the
equation of conservation of charge
+
equation of conservation of charge $\Div{\vec{j}} + \partial_t \rho = 0$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:charge}
 
\Div{\vec{j}} + \partial_t \rho = 0 ,
 
\end{equation}
 
 
so that, if $\vec{j}$ is given from the origin of time to the present, the
 
so that, if $\vec{j}$ is given from the origin of time to the present, the
charge can be obtained by integrating \eqref{eq:charge} with respect to
+
charge can be obtained by integrating this last equation with respect to
 
time. In the same way, Gauss's law \eqref{eq:gaussm} can be deduced from
 
time. In the same way, Gauss's law \eqref{eq:gaussm} can be deduced from
 
\eqref{eq:faraday} if a zero divergence of the magnetic induction is
 
\eqref{eq:faraday} if a zero divergence of the magnetic induction is
Line 42: Line 35:
  
 
== Constitutive laws ==  
 
== Constitutive laws ==  
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 +
|+ '''Electromagnetic quantities and units (MKSA)'''
 +
|-
 +
| Magnetic field        || $\vec{h}$ || $\Units{A/m}$
 +
| Magnetic flux density || $\vec{b}$ || $\Units{T}$
 +
|-
 +
| Electric field        || $\vec{e}$ || $\Units{V/m}$
 +
| Electric flux density || $\vec{d}$ || $\Units{C/m^2}$
 +
|-
 +
| Current density        || $\vec{j}$ || $\Units{A/m^2}$
 +
| Electric charge density || $\rho$    || $\Units{C/m^3}$
 +
|-
 +
| Magnetization          || $\vec{m}$ || $\Units{A/m}$
 +
| Electric polarization  || $\vec{p}$ || $\Units{C/m^2}$
 +
|-
 +
| Magnetic vector potential || $\vec{a}$ || $\Units{Wb/m}$
 +
| Magnetic scalar potential || $\phi$    || $\Units{A}$
 +
|-
 +
| Electric scalar potential || $v$      || $\Units{V}$
 +
| Electric vector potential || $\vec{}$ || $\Units{}$
 +
|-
 +
| Magnetic permeability || $\mu$      || $\Units{H/m}$
 +
| Electric permittivity || $\epsilon$ || $\Units{F/m}$
 +
|-
 +
| Electric conductivity || $\sigma$  || $\Units{S/m}$
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
  
 
All the preceding equations are general, and have never been invalidated
 
All the preceding equations are general, and have never been invalidated
since their completion by Maxwell in the late 19\high{th} century. In
+
since their completion by Maxwell in the late 19th century. In
 
vacuum, and, more generally, in systems that do not react with the
 
vacuum, and, more generally, in systems that do not react with the
 
electromagnetic field, we have $\vec{m}=0$ and $\vec{p}=0$. These systems
 
electromagnetic field, we have $\vec{m}=0$ and $\vec{p}=0$. These systems
 
are thus described by the two constants $\epsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$. In the
 
are thus described by the two constants $\epsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$. In the
 
MKSA system, $\mu_0=4\pi\E{-7}\text{H/m}$ and $\epsilon_0=1/(\mu_0
 
MKSA system, $\mu_0=4\pi\E{-7}\text{H/m}$ and $\epsilon_0=1/(\mu_0
c^2)\text{F/m}$, where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum.
+
c^2)\text{F/m}$, where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum.  
 
 
FIXME: add table with units for all fields
 
  
 
In all other situations, when field-matter interaction occurs, $\vec{j}$,
 
In all other situations, when field-matter interaction occurs, $\vec{j}$,
Line 60: Line 80:
 
constitutive laws give us the means to bypass the explicit solving of these
 
constitutive laws give us the means to bypass the explicit solving of these
 
problems, by summarizing the complex interaction between the physical
 
problems, by summarizing the complex interaction between the physical
compartment of main interest (electromagnetism in this work) and those of
+
compartment of main interest (here, electromagnetism) and those of
 
secondary importance, the detailed modeling of which can be avoided.  It is
 
secondary importance, the detailed modeling of which can be avoided.  It is
 
important to note that, even if all the constitutive relations are
 
important to note that, even if all the constitutive relations are
Line 116: Line 136:
 
$\chi_m$ is always positive. For diamagnetic materials the magnetic
 
$\chi_m$ is always positive. For diamagnetic materials the magnetic
 
susceptibility is negative. Again, it can be a tensor to describe an
 
susceptibility is negative. Again, it can be a tensor to describe an
anisotropic behavior.  For permanent magnets~\cite{lacroux-aimants-89}, one
+
anisotropic behavior.  For permanent magnets, one
 
considers a non-zero permanent magnetic field $\vec{h}_m$ supported by the
 
considers a non-zero permanent magnetic field $\vec{h}_m$ supported by the
 
magnet, and independent of the local magnetic field.  Introducing
 
magnet, and independent of the local magnetic field.  Introducing
Line 132: Line 152:
 
$\epsilon$ and $\mu$ involved in \eqref{eq:sigma}, \eqref{eq:epsilon} and
 
$\epsilon$ and $\mu$ involved in \eqref{eq:sigma}, \eqref{eq:epsilon} and
 
\eqref{eq:mu} are considered as constants. This situation is the linear case
 
\eqref{eq:mu} are considered as constants. This situation is the linear case
without memory.  
+
without memory. More accurate models will often involve nonlinear or even hysteretic (with memory) laws.
  
== Lorentz Force ==
+
<!--
 +
== Lorentz force and Maxwell stress tensor ==
  
 
FIXME: todo
 
FIXME: todo
 +
-->
  
== Time integration ==
+
== Harmonic regime and phasors ==
  
 
Two main strategies for the time integration of the equations can be
 
Two main strategies for the time integration of the equations can be
Line 177: Line 199:
 
\end{gather}
 
\end{gather}
 
where all the fields are now phasors.
 
where all the fields are now phasors.
 +
 +
== Notes ==
 +
 +
<references />
 +
  
 
[[Category:Electromagnetism]]
 
[[Category:Electromagnetism]]

Latest revision as of 07:30, 6 March 2016

\(\renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} \newcommand{\Grad}[1]{\mathbf{\text{grad}}\,{#1}} \newcommand{\Curl}[1]{\mathbf{\text{curl}}\,{#1}} \newcommand{\Div}[1]{\text{div}\,{#1}} \newcommand{\Real}[1]{\text{Re}({#1})} \newcommand{\Imag}[1]{\text{Im}({#1})} \newcommand{\pvec}[2]{{#1}\times{#2}} \newcommand{\psca}[2]{{#1}\cdot{#2}} \newcommand{\E}[1]{\,10^{#1}} \newcommand{\Ethree}{{\mathbb{E}^3}} \newcommand{\Etwo}{{\mathbb{E}^2}} \newcommand{\Units}[1]{[\mathrm{#1}]} \)Our aim is to solve numerically Maxwell's equations for macroscopic media: \begin{align} \Curl{\vec{h}} - \partial_t \vec{d} &= \vec{j} , \label{eq:ampere}\\ \Curl{\vec{e}} + \partial_t \vec{b} &= 0 , \label{eq:faraday}\\ \Div{\vec{b}} &= 0 , \label{eq:gaussm}\\ \Div{\vec{d}} &= \rho . \label{eq:gausse} \end{align} Equations \eqref{eq:ampere}, \eqref{eq:faraday}, \eqref{eq:gaussm} and \eqref{eq:gausse} are respectively the generalized Ampère law, Faraday's law, the magnetic Gauss law and the electric Gauss law. The four vector fields $\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ are called the magnetic field, the electric field, the magnetic flux density and the electric flux density[1]. Taken together, they form a mathematical representation of the same physical phenomenon: the electromagnetic field. To close the system, the following constitutive relations are added, which relate the magnetic induction to the magnetic field, and the electric displacement to the electric field: \begin{align} \vec{b} &= \mu_0 ( \vec{h} + \vec{m} ) \label{eq:bhm} , \\ \vec{d} &= \epsilon_0 \vec{e} + \vec{p} \label{eq:dep} . \end{align} The electric charge density $\rho$, the current density $\vec{j}$, the magnetization $\vec{m}$ and the electric polarization $\vec{p}$ are the source terms in these equations. Given $\rho$, $\vec{j}$, $\vec{m}$, $\vec{p}$ and proper initial values for $\vec{e}$ and $\vec{h}$ at the initial time instant $t=t_0$, the system \eqref{eq:ampere}–\eqref{eq:dep} determines $\vec{h}$, $\vec{e}$, $\vec{b}$, $\vec{d}$ for any other time instant $t$. Note that \eqref{eq:gausse} implies, by \eqref{eq:ampere}, the equation of conservation of charge $\Div{\vec{j}} + \partial_t \rho = 0$, so that, if $\vec{j}$ is given from the origin of time to the present, the charge can be obtained by integrating this last equation with respect to time. In the same way, Gauss's law \eqref{eq:gaussm} can be deduced from \eqref{eq:faraday} if a zero divergence of the magnetic induction is initially assumed.

Constitutive laws

Electromagnetic quantities and units (MKSA)
Magnetic field $\vec{h}$ $\Units{A/m}$ Magnetic flux density $\vec{b}$ $\Units{T}$
Electric field $\vec{e}$ $\Units{V/m}$ Electric flux density $\vec{d}$ $\Units{C/m^2}$
Current density $\vec{j}$ $\Units{A/m^2}$ Electric charge density $\rho$ $\Units{C/m^3}$
Magnetization $\vec{m}$ $\Units{A/m}$ Electric polarization $\vec{p}$ $\Units{C/m^2}$
Magnetic vector potential $\vec{a}$ $\Units{Wb/m}$ Magnetic scalar potential $\phi$ $\Units{A}$
Electric scalar potential $v$ $\Units{V}$ Electric vector potential $\vec{}$ $\Units{}$
Magnetic permeability $\mu$ $\Units{H/m}$ Electric permittivity $\epsilon$ $\Units{F/m}$
Electric conductivity $\sigma$ $\Units{S/m}$


All the preceding equations are general, and have never been invalidated since their completion by Maxwell in the late 19th century. In vacuum, and, more generally, in systems that do not react with the electromagnetic field, we have $\vec{m}=0$ and $\vec{p}=0$. These systems are thus described by the two constants $\epsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$. In the MKSA system, $\mu_0=4\pi\E{-7}\text{H/m}$ and $\epsilon_0=1/(\mu_0 c^2)\text{F/m}$, where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum.

In all other situations, when field-matter interaction occurs, $\vec{j}$, $\vec{m}$ and $\vec{p}$ are obtained by solving the equations describing the physical phenomena (mechanical, thermal, chemical, etc.) related to the dynamics of the charges involved in the interaction. Rigorously, one should then deal with the resolution of complex coupled systems. But the constitutive laws give us the means to bypass the explicit solving of these problems, by summarizing the complex interaction between the physical compartment of main interest (here, electromagnetism) and those of secondary importance, the detailed modeling of which can be avoided. It is important to note that, even if all the constitutive relations are (sometimes rough) approximations of the physical behavior of the considered coupled systems, they often permit to describe very accurately the macroscopic behavior of the considered systems.

Ohm's law

The first constitutive law we adopt is Ohm's law, valid for conductors (where the current density is considered to be proportional to the electric field) and generators (where the source current density $\vec{j}_s$ can be considered as imposed, independently of the local electromagnetic field): \begin{equation}\label{eq:sigma} \vec{j} = \sigma \vec{e} + \vec{j}_s . \end{equation} The conductivity $\sigma$ is always positive (or equal to zero for insulators), and can be a tensor, in order to take an anisotropic behavior into account. Note that this relation is only valid for non-moving conductors: for a conductor moving at speed $\vec{v}$, \eqref{eq:sigma} becomes $\vec{j} = \sigma (\vec{e} + \pvec{\vec{v}}{\vec{b}}) + \vec{j}_s$.

Dielectric constitutive law

The second constitutive law describes the behavior of dielectric materials, stating a proportionality between the polarization and the electric field, as it would be if the charges were elastically bound, with a restoring force proportional to the electric field: \begin{equation}\label{eq:pe} \vec{p} = \chi_e \vec{e} + \vec{p}_e . \end{equation} Again, the electric susceptibility $\chi_e$ can be a tensor to describe an anisotropic behavior. A permanent polarization $\vec{p}_e$ is considered for materials exhibiting a permanent polarization independent of the electric field, such as electrets. Introducing \eqref{eq:pe} in \eqref{eq:dep}, we get \begin{align} \vec{d} & = \epsilon_0 \vec{e} + \chi_e \vec{e} + \vec{p}_e \nonumber\\ & = (\epsilon_0 + \chi_e ) \vec{e} + \vec{p}_e \nonumber\\ & = \epsilon_0 \epsilon_r \vec{e} + \vec{p}_e \nonumber\\ & = \epsilon \vec{e} + \vec{p}_e \label{eq:epsilon} , \end{align} where $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon_r=1+\chi_e/\epsilon_0$ are the electric permittivity and the relative electric permittivity of the material respectively.

Magnetic constitutive law

The third constitutive law expresses an approximate relation between the magnetization and the magnetic field in magnetic materials: \begin{equation}\label{eq:mh} \vec{m} = \chi_m \vec{h} + \vec{h}_m . \end{equation} For paramagnetic and ferromagnetic materials, the magnetic susceptibility $\chi_m$ is always positive. For diamagnetic materials the magnetic susceptibility is negative. Again, it can be a tensor to describe an anisotropic behavior. For permanent magnets, one considers a non-zero permanent magnetic field $\vec{h}_m$ supported by the magnet, and independent of the local magnetic field. Introducing \eqref{eq:mh} in \eqref{eq:bhm}, we get \begin{align} \vec{b} & = \mu_0 ( \vec{h} + \chi_m \vec{h} + \vec{h}_m ) \nonumber\\ & = \mu_0 ( 1 + \chi_m ) \vec{h} + \mu_0 \vec{h}_m \nonumber\\ & = \mu_0 \mu_r \vec{h} + \mu_0 \vec{h}_m \nonumber\\ & = \mu \vec{h} + \mu_0 \vec{h}_m \label{eq:mu} , \end{align} where $\mu$ and $\mu_r=1+\chi_m$ are the magnetic permeability and the relative magnetic permeability of the material respectively.

In the simplest modeling option, the material characteristics $\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and $\mu$ involved in \eqref{eq:sigma}, \eqref{eq:epsilon} and \eqref{eq:mu} are considered as constants. This situation is the linear case without memory. More accurate models will often involve nonlinear or even hysteretic (with memory) laws.


Harmonic regime and phasors

Two main strategies for the time integration of the equations can be used. For a classical time domain analysis, appropriate initial conditions must be provided. But if the system is fed by a sinusoidal excitation and if its response is linear (which is the case if all operators and the material characteristics are linear), the problem can also be solved in the frequency domain. For a sinusoidal variation of angular frequency $\omega$, any field can then be described as \begin{equation} f(\vec{x},t) = f_m(\vec{x}) \cos(\omega t+\varphi(\vec{x})), \end{equation} where $\varphi(\vec{x})$ is a phase angle (expressed in radians) which can depend on the position. The harmonic approach then consists in defining this physical field as the real part of a complex field, i.e.: \begin{equation}\label{eq:cplx} f(\vec{x},t) = \Real{f_m(\vec{x}) e^{i(\omega t+\varphi(\vec{x}))}} = \Real{f_p(\vec{x}) e^{i\omega t}} , \end{equation} where $i=\sqrt{-1}$ denotes the imaginary unit. The complex field \begin{equation} f_p(\vec{x}) = f_m(\vec{x}) e^{i\varphi(\vec{x})} = f_r(\vec{x}) + i f_i(\vec{x}) \end{equation} appearing in \eqref{eq:cplx} is called a phasor, $f_r(\vec{x})$ and $f_i(\vec{x})$ being its real and imaginary parts respectively. If all physical fields are expressed as in \eqref{eq:cplx}, their substitution in the equations of the system leads to complex equations, the unknowns of which are phasors. Through \eqref{eq:cplx}, the time derivative operator becomes a product by the factor $i\omega$. In particular, Maxwell's equations \eqref{eq:ampere}–\eqref{eq:gausse} in harmonic regime become \begin{gather} \Curl{\vec{h}} - i\omega \vec{d} = \vec{j} \label{eq:ampere:cplx} , \\ \Curl{\vec{e}} + i\omega \vec{b} = 0 \label{eq:faraday:cplx} , \\ \Div{\vec{b}} = 0 \label{eq:gaussm:cplx} , \\ \Div{\vec{d}} = \rho \label{eq:gausse:cplx} , \end{gather} where all the fields are now phasors.

Notes

  1. Many different names are used to denote these four vector fields (see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field). We tend to use magnetic flux density and magnetic induction indifferently for $\vec{b}$. We also use electric flux density and electric displacement field indifferently for $\vec{d}$.