Difference between revisions of "Magnetostriction"

From ONELAB
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* choke.geo: the geometry, which is parametrized
 
* choke.geo: the geometry, which is parametrized
 
* choke.pro: pro File associated to choke.geo  
 
* choke.pro: pro File associated to choke.geo  
 +
* Magsta2D.pro: the electromagnetic physics
 
* Elasticity_2D.pro: the mechanical physics
 
* Elasticity_2D.pro: the mechanical physics
 +
* jacobian.pro: the integration and Jacobian methods
 
* magnetostriction.txt: the magnetostriction curve
 
* magnetostriction.txt: the magnetostriction curve
* jacobian.pro: the integration and Jacobian methods
 
* Magsta2D.pro: the electromagnetic physics
 
  
 
== Assumptions==
 
== Assumptions==
Line 167: Line 167:
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
  
4 resolution methods are provided:
+
3 resolution methods are provided:
 
* A magnetostatic study
 
* A magnetostatic study
 
* A magneto-mechanical study with allows to estimate the complete deflection of the magnetic core due to magnetic effects
 
* A magneto-mechanical study with allows to estimate the complete deflection of the magnetic core due to magnetic effects
* A magneto-mechanical study on a specific point. It computes the deflection of a specific point. It is the same procedure as the previous point but allow easily to compute the FRF on a specific point. It shows that magnetostriction and/or Maxwell dtress tensor can stimulate a resonnance
+
* A mechanical study to obtain the eigenmodes of the inductor.
* A mechanical study to obtain the eigen mode of the inductor.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Results==
 
== Results==
 
 
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
{{metamodelfooter|magnetostriction}}
 
{{metamodelfooter|magnetostriction}}

Revision as of 11:39, 23 April 2015

2D model of inductor with magnetostriction.

Download model archive (magnetostriction.zip)
Browse individual model files

Introduction

To run the model, open choke.pro with Gmsh.

This 2D model computes the mechanical deflection of a two columns inductor. It takes into account:

  • The magnetostriction effect in magnetic sheets
  • The Maxwell stress tensor into the whole domain (Airgap and magnetic core)

Magnetic and mechanical physics are weakly coupled and assume that mechanical deflections do not modify the magnetic field. In this way, the magnetic field is first computed, and the Maxwell stress tensor as well as the magnetostriction strain tensor are deduced from this simulation. These two tensors are then injected in the mechanical simulation to obtain the deflection.

The mecanical model also allows to estimate the different resonant frequencies or the inductor.

File details:

  • choke.geo: the geometry, which is parametrized
  • choke.pro: pro File associated to choke.geo
  • Magsta2D.pro: the electromagnetic physics
  • Elasticity_2D.pro: the mechanical physics
  • jacobian.pro: the integration and Jacobian methods
  • magnetostriction.txt: the magnetostriction curve

Assumptions

Geometry

A two columns inductor is modelled and the geometry can be modified using parameters:

  • column height
  • column width
  • number of airgap
  • airgap thichness
  • yoke length
  • winding thickness

Boundaries

Magnetic

The magnectic vector potential a is fixed to 0 on the external boundaries of the system. The current density is imposed into the winding and deduced thanks to the nominal current, the number of turns and the cross section of the winding.

Mechanical

The inferior yoke is assumed fixed (displacement u=0).

Magnetics

A 2D Magnetostatic solver is used for this study. The model computes the magnectic vector potential a. Materials are considered linear and sources of currents are directly imposed. The solver is coded in the file MagSta_2D.pro

\( \begin{eqnarray} \nabla^2 \mathbf{A} + \mu_0 \mu_r \mathbf{j_z} = \mathbf{0} \label{eq:vector_potential} \end{eqnarray} \)

Different post-proccessing are predefined:

  • The flux density B
  • The magnetic field H
  • The energy per length unit (J/m)


Maxwell Stress Tensor

The Maxwell Stress Tensor is deduced directly from the magnetic field and is injected into the mechanical solver.

\(\begin{eqnarray} \sigma_{mst}= \frac{1}{\mu_0\mu_r}\begin{bmatrix} B_x^2 -\frac{1}{2}B^2 & B_xB_y\\ B_xB_y & B_y^2 -\frac{1}{2}B^2 \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:stress} \end{eqnarray}\)

The following code in used :

 sig_maxwell[]=Vector[ CompX[$1]*CompX[$1]-Norm[$1]*Norm[$1]/2,
		       CompY[$1]*CompY[$1]-Norm[$1]*Norm[$1]/2,
		       CompX[$1]*CompY[$1]];

Magnetostriction strain tensor

The magnetostriction tensor is obtained using the flux density map and with the magnetostriction curve of the material witch links the strain with the flux density. This kind of curve is presented on the following figure:

Magnetostriction curve.png

The curve permits to determine the strain tensor in the referential (Bt,Bn) presented below:

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

The strain tensor is decomposed into two phenomenas: the normal and tangential magnetostriction, called respectively \(\lambda_N\) and \(\lambda_T\). \(\lambda_T\) could be obtained using experimental data, or by asuming that magnetostriction doesn't modify the volume, a simple relation is obtained\[\lambda_N=-\lambda_N/2\]

\( \begin{eqnarray} \epsilon_{(B_t,B_n)}=\begin{bmatrix} \lambda_T & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_N \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:strain_tensor1} \end{eqnarray} \)

In order to be injected into the mechanical model, the strain tensor needs to be converted into the (x,y) basis. This is done by computing the change of basis matrix P. In this way the strain tensor in the basis (x,y) is determined\[ \begin{eqnarray} P=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{B_x}{B} & -\frac{B_y}{B} \\ \frac{B_y}{B} & \frac{B_x}{B} \\ \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:P} \end{eqnarray} \]

\( \begin{eqnarray} \epsilon_{(x,y)}=P \epsilon_{(B_t,B_n)}\ P^t \label{eq:PPT} \end{eqnarray} \)

\( \begin{eqnarray} \epsilon_{(x,y)}=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{B^2}(\lambda_T B_x^2+\lambda_N B_y^2) & \frac{B_xB_y}{B^2}(\lambda_T-\lambda_N) \\ \frac{B_xB_y}{B^2}(\lambda_T-\lambda_N) & \frac{1}{B^2}(\lambda_T B_y^2+\lambda_N B_x^2) \\ \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:strain_xyz} \end{eqnarray} \)

The following code in used :


lamb[]=Vector[lambdap[Norm[$1]],lambdaper[Norm[$1]],0];

sig_vect[]=C_m[]*lamb[$1];

sig_mat[]=Tensor[CompX[sig_vect[$1]], CompZ[sig_vect[$1]]  ,   0,
	         CompZ[sig_vect[$1]], CompY[sig_vect[$1]]  ,   0,
		            0	    ,          0	   ,   0 ];

// Change of basis

P[]=Tensor[ CompX[$1]/Norm[$1]  ,   -CompY[$1]/Norm[$1] , 0,
            CompY[$1]/Norm[$1]  ,    CompX[$1]/Norm[$1] , 0,
                       0        ,             0         , 1 ];
PP[]=Transpose[P[$1]];
sig_PPP[]=P[$1]*sig_mat[$1]*PP[$1];
sig_magnetostriction[]=Vector[CompXX[sig_PPP[$1]],CompYY[sig_PPP[$1]],CompXY[sig_PPP[$1]]];


Mechanical

A 2D mechanical solver is added to the model. This harmonic solver permits to compute the deflection of the inductor due to the magnetostriction and the Maxwell stress tensor. It also permits to obtain the eigen modes of the magnetic core. No damping is currently added so that resonnance are not ...


Resolution

3 resolution methods are provided:

  • A magnetostatic study
  • A magneto-mechanical study with allows to estimate the complete deflection of the magnetic core due to magnetic effects
  • A mechanical study to obtain the eigenmodes of the inductor.

Results

References

Models developed by Mathieu Rossi, Jean Le Besnerais and Christophe Geuzaine. Copyright (c) 2015 EOMYS