[Gmsh] MeshFormat Version number

[Rui Maciel]

Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> Exactly: it's a very small change, only affecting the optional 
> $PhysicalNames/$EndPhysicalNames section.
> 
> The problem was that with version 2, we did not save a dimension (0D, 
> 1D, 2D or 3D) together with the name. Hence we could not guarantee a 
> one-to-one mapping between physical names and physical numbers. Indeed, 
>   physical numbers need only to be unique per dimension (you can have 
> Physical Point(1) and Physical Line(1)).

In that case is the definition of the new document format version still open to 
suggestions? 


Rui Maciel