[Gmsh] Periodic Surface : bug ?

francoise.saliou at free.fr francoise.saliou at free.fr
Fri Oct 22 20:45:39 CEST 2010


I tried to use the periodic boundary condition with gmsh 2.5 (see attached
helix.geo file)

I obtained a strange result when imposing periodicity between surface 205
(slave) and surface 203 (master) (last line of *.geo file). Did I made a mistake
(bad syntax or anything else ...) or is it a bug?
In the expression-list should the boundary lines of each surface be signed or is
it pointless? (I tried both with same bad result)

Thanks for helping


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: helix.geo
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20101022/019a7266/attachment.geo>