[Gmsh] Segmentation fault when writing 2D order 2 mesh

[Christophe Geuzaine]

On 13/03/11 21:08, Karin&NiKo wrote:
> Sorry Christophe. You are right. The complete second elements are
> produced in *Aster* from incomplete ones. When writing result files,
> we turn the quad9 into quad8.

Ok. In any case I fixed the code so that it will not crash anymore when 
trying to export unsupported elements.

>
> Another information : a brand new verson 3.0 with more features will be
> released in the next months.
>
> Good night,
> Nicolas
>
> 2011/3/13 Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be
> <mailto:cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be>>
>
>     On 11/03/11 13:08, Karin&NiKo wrote:
>
>         Yes they are.
>         BTW, using incomplete second order elements is OK.
>
>
>     Hmm... In the version of MED we have here (MED 2.3.4) this is what's
>     defined in med.h:
>
>     typedef enum {MED_POINT1=1, MED_SEG2=102, MED_SEG3=103, MED_TRIA3=203,
>                   MED_QUAD4=204, MED_TRIA6=206,MED_QUAD8=208,MED_TETRA4=304,
>                   MED_PYRA5=305, MED_PENTA6=306, MED_HEXA8=308,
>     MED_TETRA10=310,
>                   MED_PYRA13=313, MED_PENTA15=315, MED_HEXA20=320,
>                   MED_POLYGONE=400, MED_POLYEDRE=500, MED_NONE=0}
>     med_geometrie_element;
>
>     Should we switch to a newer version?
>
>
>         Nicolas
>
>         2011/3/11 Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be
>         <mailto:cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be>
>         <mailto:cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be <mailto:cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be>>>
>
>             On 11/03/11 09:47, Karin&NiKo wrote:
>
>                 Dear Gmsh-ers,
>
>                 I would like to report a bug that appears with gmsh
>         2.5.0 and
>                 also in
>                 the nightly build.
>                 When trying to write the mesh generated by the attached
>         script, a
>                 segmentation fault occurs :
>
>                 /opt/gmsh-2.5.1-svn-Linux/bin/gmsh -2 -format med -o
>         carre-Q2.mmed
>                 carre.geo
>
>                 Please notice that :
>                 - no problem occurs when using a first order mesh
>                 - the unv format for the 2nd order mesh can be written
>         but, when
>                 read
>                 back in gmsh, the mesh is wrong
>
>
>             Hi Nico - Indeed, it looks like 9-node quads I/O is not
>         implemented
>             for MED (nor UNV). I don't remember why I did not implement
>         this...
>             Are 9-node quads supported by MED?
>
>
>                 Nicolas
>
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 gmsh mailing list
>         gmsh at geuz.org <mailto:gmsh at geuz.org> <mailto:gmsh at geuz.org
>         <mailto:gmsh at geuz.org>>
>
>         http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
>
>
>             --
>             Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>             University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
>         http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>         <http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/%7Egeuzaine>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>     University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
>     http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>
>


-- 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine