[Gmsh] Tutorial for Post-Process using gmsh 2.5

[jmb]

Hello Jean Pierre AUBRY,

Thank you for your suggestions! I have been doing so a bit at a time, 
and I hope to make progress during the next few days.  But at present I 
am stumped on all fronts with the myriad of incompatibilities introduced 
by the premature shift to Med3 by Salome and CodeAster without any 
thought process towards interoperability, and product simulation data 
longevity ...

I am at present stumped by step one, namely reading a *-res.med file 
into Gmsh_2.5.  Unless I step back to CodeAster 10.3.x and Salome_5.1.x 
and redo my entire study, I am stuck.  What an awful state of affairs.  
I am appalled by some of these directional decisions taken by the 
CodeAster-Salome team...

Regards, JMB

jean pierre aubry wrote:
> hello
>
> you did read my little bookelt?
> there are some explanations about that
> also the pdf Gmsh manual shoud be read about that
> and finally
> you should try to write Gmsh native Postpro .pos file 
> and or use STANLEY
>
> regarding
>   
>> I am not sure of the post processing capabilities (accuracy) of the
>> latest version of Salome_6.3.1 and would like another means of
>> verifying the results. Thanks.
>>     
> i am sure of the UNcapabilities of Salome in 1D element problems when
> they get larger tha a few elements
>
> jean pierre aubry
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2011, at 03:13, jmb wrote:
>
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> Would somebody recommend a good tutorial for learning how to post
>> process CodeAster result files using gmsh, please?
>>
>> I have tried various ways and I get nothing when I import a CodeAster
>> Ver_11+ MED file.  Is this because gmsh cannot open the Med3 format?
>> If so is there an upgraded version of gmsh available; or in the
>> development stages as a daily snapshot that one can attempt at
>> compiling?  I am using Ubuntu Jaunty (and Lucid) in a 64bit OS.
>>
>>     
>
> Hi guys - we're working on it, but it's not yet in the nightly builds.
> Moving from MED2 to MED3 is actually a lot more work than what we
> initially thought, due to significant changes in the MED library.
>
>
>   
>> I am not sure of the post processing capabilities (accuracy) of the
>> latest version of Salome_6.3.1 and would like another means of
>> verifying the results. Thanks.
>>
>> Regards, JMB
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at geuz.org
> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20110917/ac6a2c63/attachment.html>