[Gmsh] Ensuring conformal meshing when using geomtry from Freecad
Juan E. Sanchez
juan.e.sanchez at gmail.com
Fri Apr 6 19:35:26 CEST 2018
Hello Jeremy,
Is my understanding correct that there would only be one material volume
per brep file? I would use freecad, but it seems painful to try to
import one brep per material into gmsh, and then attempt to get gmsh to
merge the interfaces. I thought Coherence might not work very well, and
performing a boolean fragments operation on multiple brep volumes might
not work either.
Regards,
Juan
On 4/6/18 9:44 AM, jeremy theler wrote:
> apply the boolean operation in freecad (in the options you can choose
> "compsolid" mode) and then export to brep
> alternatively use the gmsh command "Coherence"
> I suggest you search online for further information on compsolids in
> freecad and thr coherence command in gmsh
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 03:05 Benedikt Oswald <benedikt.oswald at lspr.swiss>
> wrote:
>
> Dear juan, thank you very much for your detailed answer!
>
> In fact, our workflow definitely requires geometry construction in
>
> Freecad and then meshing in gmsh; nevertheless, I
>
> will try to debug the problem along your suggested
>
> procedure.
>
> thanks again and greetings, Benedikt
>
>
>
> Am 05.04.18 um 17:22 schrieb Juan Sanchez:
> > Hello Benedikt,
> >
> > I am using the OpenCascade factory to do the Boolean Operations in
> > gmsh. This is using the pygmsh python module to help automate the
> > process:
> >
> > https://github.com/nschloe/pygmsh/tree/master/pygmsh
> >
> > The boolean operations can then be performed using code like this:
> > https://github.com/nschloe/pygmsh/issues/164
> >
> > import pygmsh
> > geom = pygmsh.opencascade.Geometry(
> > characteristic_length_min=0.1,
> > characteristic_length_max=0.1,
> > )
> >
> > def create_vol_volume(geom, h, w, l, x, z, cr, lcar=100):
> > f = 0.5*w
> > y = [-f,-f+cr, +f-cr, +f]
> > z = [z, z + (h-cr), z + h]
> > f = 0.5 * cr
> > points = []
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[0], z[0]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[0], z[1]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[1], z[1]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[1], z[2]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[2], z[2]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[2], z[1]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[3], z[1]), lcar=lcar))
> > points.append(geom.add_point((x, y[3], z[0]), lcar=lcar))
> >
> > lines = []
> > lines.append(geom.add_line(points[0], points[1]))
> > lines.append(geom.add_circle_arc(points[1], points[2], points[3]))
> >
> > lines.append(geom.add_line(points[3], points[4]))
> > lines.append(geom.add_circle_arc(points[4], points[5], points[6]))
> > lines.append(geom.add_line(points[6], points[7]))
> > lines.append(geom.add_line(points[7], points[0]))
> >
> > line_loop=geom.add_line_loop(lines)
> > surface=geom.add_plane_surface(line_loop)
> > vol = geom.extrude(surface, translation_axis=[l, 0, 0])[1]
> > return vol
> >
> >
> > h_top=40
> > corner_radius=2.5
> >
> > z_vol=0
> > h_vol=25
> > w_vol=10
> > l_vol=100
> > x_vol=-0.5*l_vol
> > vol=create_vol_volume(geom, h=h_vol, w=w_vol, l=l_vol, x=x_vol,
> > z=z_vol, cr=corner_radius)
> >
> > z_vol2=0
> > l_vol2=50
> > t_vol2=1
> > w_vol2=w_vol+2*t_vol2
> > h_vol2=h_vol+t_vol2
> > x_vol2=x_vol + 0.5*(l_vol-l_vol2)
> > vol2=create_vol_volume(geom, h=h_vol2, w=w_vol2, l=l_vol2, x=x_vol2,
> > z=z_vol2, cr=corner_radius)
> > vol2=geom.boolean_difference([vol2], [vol], delete_first=True,
> > delete_other=False)
> > geom.boolean_fragments([vol2, vol], [], delete_first=True,
> delete_other=False)
> > print(geom.get_code())
> >
> >
> > And then you can label the volumes as physical volumes and mesh the
> > resulting geo file.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Juan
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Benedikt Oswald
> > <benedikt.oswald at lspr.swiss> wrote:
> >> Dear gmsh developers
> >>
> >> I recently tried to mesh a geometry (made in Freecad) which
> consists of
> >> two volumes where a smaller volume was
> >>
> >> subtracted in Freecad from the larger one. When I mesh the two
> volumes I
> >> would need tetrahedra
> >>
> >> and that are conformal between the two volumes. Would you have a
> >> suggestion on how
> >>
> >> to achieve this ? At the moment, gmsh does not really produce a
> >> conformal mesh.
> >>
> >> I attach the files in question.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot in advance and greetings, Benedikt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Dr. sc. techn. Benedikt Oswald - first engineer - LSPR AG -
> phone +41 43 366 90 74
> >> Grubenstrasse 9, CH-8045 Zürich, benedikt.oswald at lspr.swiss
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmsh mailing list
> >> gmsh at onelab.info <mailto:gmsh at onelab.info>
> >> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmsh mailing list
> > gmsh at onelab.info <mailto:gmsh at onelab.info>
> > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. sc. techn. Benedikt Oswald - first engineer - LSPR AG - phone
> +41 43 366 90 74
> Grubenstrasse 9, CH-8045 Zürich, benedikt.oswald at lspr.swiss
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at onelab.info <mailto:gmsh at onelab.info>
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> --
> --
> jeremy theler
> www.seamplex.com <http://www.seamplex.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh at onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
More information about the gmsh
mailing list