<html><head></head><body><div><br></div><div>On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 12:00 +0200, Zuheyr Alsalihi wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Thank you I appreciated it very much. <br></div><div>Prof. Geuzaine indicated me a solution in the follow-up.</div><div><br></div><div>As i mentioned in my reply to his email below, I was confused/did not think, that the CPS6 type surface element <br></div><div>with its own ID is one of the faces of a 3D C3D10 type tetrahedra element who has another ID. <br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would like to comment on this. I find the way that CalculiX treats all this very awkard, and leads users</div><div>into situations like what happens to you. Gmsh's approach is far superior. I do not understand why</div><div>many many users keep on with codes like CalculiX that take all the FEA stuff back to the 70s.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>So looping over the tagged physical group surface elements is what I need to do! <br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Actually, this should be done on the FEA solver side, not on the user side.</div><div>But again, there are people that are happy with FORTRAN.</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>jeremy theler</div><div><a href="http://www.seamplex.com">www.seamplex.com</a></div><div><br></div></body></html>