<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear all, thank you for your support and time. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Attached to this mail you will find the .geo file. Currently, I'm working with gmsh-3.0.6 on a Linux system (64 bits). I used the GUI to load the .geo and build the mesh. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards</div><div><br></div><div>O.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Felix Salazar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:felix.salazar@polymtl.ca" target="_blank">felix.salazar@polymtl.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">My experience with this type of issue has been that, for the same architecture, with a binary compiled with the same options, the meshes are repeatable. Some minor differences might occur when some options are missing in the binary in another computer. And I've seen that the numbers associated with extruded entities sometimes change between different computers. That was actually common.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But I think all that was before version 3.0. At the time I was generating meshes in different architectures and spotting those differences in mesh was easier (frequently with errors in the geometry generation). I never considered it a bug. I just tried to build robust .geo files where the surface/volume numbers were implicit.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks to the devs for all the improvements throughout these years!</div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 9, 2018 4:18 PM, "Christophe Geuzaine" <<a href="mailto:cgeuzaine@uliege.be" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">cgeuzaine@uliege.be</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_-8110546839234048436m_-6330767022451030582quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="m_-8110546839234048436m_-6330767022451030582quoted-text"><br>
<br>
> On 9 Aug 2018, at 21:44, Juan E. Sanchez <<a href="mailto:juan.e.sanchez@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">juan.e.sanchez@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hello,<br>
> <br>
> Are you saying that gmsh generated meshes are now repeatable for the same inputs? <br>
<br></div>
Yes, with the latest snapshots they should be.<div class="m_-8110546839234048436m_-6330767022451030582quoted-text"><br>
<br>
> That has never been my experience in the past.<br>
<br></div>
Correct. A lot has been happening since Gmsh 3.0 :-)<div class="m_-8110546839234048436m_-6330767022451030582quoted-text"><br>
<br>
> <br>
> Regards,<br>
> <br>
> Juan<br>
> <br>
> On 8/9/18 11:11 AM, Jean-François Remacle wrote:<br>
>> Hello<br>
>> This should NOT happen. Can you send the script ?<br>
>>> Le 9 août 2018 à 17:27, Octavio Castillo Reyes <<a href="mailto:ocastilloreyes@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">ocastilloreyes@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Dear all,<br>
>>> <br>
>>> First I would like to say that gmsh is a great tool and I congratulate the developers.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> I'm working with tetrahedral meshes and I have noticed that for the same script, gmsh produces different meshes, that is, the number of elements or nodes is different. This is without making changes to the .geo file, does anyone have any idea how to fix it?<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Thank you very much<br>
>>> <br>
>>> O.<br>
>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>> gmsh mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:gmsh@onelab.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">gmsh@onelab.info</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gmsh</a><br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> gmsh mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:gmsh@onelab.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">gmsh@onelab.info</a><br>
>> <a href="http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gmsh</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> gmsh mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:gmsh@onelab.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">gmsh@onelab.info</a><br>
> <a href="http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gmsh</a><br>
<br></div>
— <br>
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine<br>
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science <br>
<a href="http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.<wbr>be/~geuzaine</a><br>
<br>
Free software: <a href="http://gmsh.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://gmsh.info</a> | <a href="http://getdp.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://getdp.info</a> | <a href="http://onelab.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info</a><div class="m_-8110546839234048436m_-6330767022451030582elided-text"><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
gmsh mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gmsh@onelab.info" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">gmsh@onelab.info</a><br>
<a href="http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gmsh</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
gmsh mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gmsh@onelab.info">gmsh@onelab.info</a><br>
<a href="http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://onelab.info/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gmsh</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>