[Getdp] Re: (no subject)

[janvrot at infolink.com.br]

Salut Johan

That's it! Otherwise, do you know hot to introduce this non linear term
in the scalar magnetic potential formulation? I was running a case with
it, and I supose this way I could solve my problem.

Patrick mentioned this possibility in a 3D formulation example in the
t5.geo 2001 FAQ.

Janvrot

Johan Gyselinck wrote:
> 
> Salut Ivan,
> 
> > Ok, here is the last version for the whole stuff. Actually I'm using
> >
> > mostly the same Magnetostatic.pro (adapted from yours). That's
> > exactly
> > the point: how to treat 3D.
> 
> I understand now! The 2D formulation (with Form1P) can't possibly work
> for a 3D problem. I'm afraid that you will have to be patient for a
> while, until someone (Christophe, Patrick?) finds the time to make a
> well documented example.
> 
> Johan
> 
> --
> Dr. ir. Johan Gyselinck
> University of Liege
> Dept. of Electrical Engineering (ELAP), Institut Montefiore
> Campus du Sart Tilman, Parking P32, Bâtiment B28, B-4000 LIEGE, Belgique
> phone: +32-4-3663732 -- fax: +32-4-3662910 -- http://elap.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/
> 
> 

-- 
Janvrot IVM
janvrot at infolink.com.br