Hi all, I tried to mesh a pretty big geometry I'm working on with netgen but ran out of memory on my 16 GB RAM machine. Is there any chance gmsh is more efficient? I assume making a surface mesh takes less memory than full 3D? If so, I should be able to make a surface mesh (with the 2D button) even if I run out of memory for the full 3D in gmsh, right? Aron Wahlberg