[Gmsh] Segmentation fault when writing 2D order 2 mesh

[Karin&NiKo]

Yes they are.
BTW, using incomplete second order elements is OK.

Nicolas

2011/3/11 Karin&NiKo <niko.karin at gmail.com>

> Yes they are.
> BTW, using incomplete second order elements is OK.
>
> Nicolas
>
> 2011/3/11 Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at ulg.ac.be>
>
> On 11/03/11 09:47, Karin&NiKo wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Gmsh-ers,
>>>
>>> I would like to report a bug that appears with gmsh 2.5.0 and also in
>>> the nightly build.
>>> When trying to write the mesh generated by the attached script, a
>>> segmentation fault occurs :
>>>
>>> /opt/gmsh-2.5.1-svn-Linux/bin/gmsh -2 -format med -o carre-Q2.mmed
>>> carre.geo
>>>
>>> Please notice that :
>>> - no problem occurs when using a first order mesh
>>> - the unv format for the 2nd order mesh can be written but, when read
>>> back in gmsh, the mesh is wrong
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Nico - Indeed, it looks like 9-node quads I/O is not implemented for
>> MED (nor UNV). I don't remember why I did not implement this... Are 9-node
>> quads supported by MED?
>>
>>
>>  Nicolas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gmsh mailing list
>>> gmsh at geuz.org
>>> http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
>> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
>> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20110311/8c971959/attachment.html>