[Gmsh] Different results for different stations or users
RENARD Francois
francois.renard at cea.fr
Mon Sep 21 10:25:01 CEST 2015
Hello,
Thank you for this great mesh tool !
I obtain (slightly) different results when running GMSH from the same
geometry (.geo file) :
- on different (linux CentOS 6.7) stations
- on the same machine but from different users
For example two different users have obtained the following different
results on the same station :
First user : 86048 vertices 553346 elements 382088 tetrahedra
Statistics:
Input points: 50580
Input facets: 101156
Input segments: 151734
Input holes: 0
Input regions: 0
Mesh points: 50580
Mesh tetrahedra: 151938
Mesh faces: 354454
Mesh edges: 253095
Mesh faces on exterior boundary: 101156
Mesh edges on exterior boundary: 151734
Mesh faces on input facets: 101156
Mesh edges on input segments: 151734
Info : 50580 points 253095 edges and 101156 faces in the initial mesh
Info : Found region 1
Info : 0 points created - Worst tet radius is 24.375 (PTS removed 0 0)
Info : 4927 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.73689 (PTS removed
0 73)
Info : 9901 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.45257 (PTS removed
0 99)
Info : 14867 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.29636 (PTS
removed 0 133)
Info : 19826 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.1871 (PTS removed
0 174)
Info : 24786 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.10673 (PTS
removed 0 214)
Info : 29730 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.05069 (PTS
removed 0 270)
Info : 34664 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.00635 (PTS
removed 0 336)
Info : 3D point insertion terminated (86048 points created):
Info : - 344 Delaunay cavities modified for star shapeness
Info : - 340 points could not be inserted
Info : - 382088 tetrahedra created in 6.25905 sec. (61045 tets/sec.)
Info : Done meshing 3D (14.4008 s)
Info : 86048 vertices 553346 elements
Info : Writing 'geom3d.msh'...
Info : Done writing 'geom3d.msh'
Info : Stopped on Fri Sep 18 15:47:55 2015
Second user : 86048 vertices 553388 elements 382130 tetrahedra
Statistics:
Input points: 50580
Input facets: 101156
Input segments: 151734
Input holes: 0
Input regions: 0
Mesh points: 50580
Mesh tetrahedra: 151938
Mesh faces: 354454
Mesh edges: 253095
Mesh faces on exterior boundary: 101156
Mesh edges on exterior boundary: 151734
Mesh faces on input facets: 101156
Mesh edges on input segments: 151734
Info : 50580 points 253095 edges and 101156 faces in the initial mesh
Info : Found region 1
Info : 0 points created - Worst tet radius is 24.375 (PTS removed 0 0)
Info : 4930 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.73677 (PTS removed
0 70)
Info : 9906 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.45214 (PTS removed
0 94)
Info : 14871 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.29598 (PTS
removed 0 129)
Info : 19830 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.18694 (PTS
removed 0 170)
Info : 24789 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.10668 (PTS
removed 0 211)
Info : 29731 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.05068 (PTS
removed 0 269)
Info : 34670 points created - Worst tet radius is 1.00629 (PTS
removed 0 330)
Info : 3D point insertion terminated (86048 points created):
Info : - 345 Delaunay cavities modified for star shapeness
Info : - 335 points could not be inserted
Info : - 382130 tetrahedra created in 6.28704 sec. (60780 tets/sec.)
Info : Done meshing 3D (14.4428 s)
Info : 86048 vertices 553388 elements
Info : Writing 'geom3d.msh'...
Info : Done writing 'geom3d.msh'
Info : Stopped on Fri Sep 18 14:26:18 2015
Is it possible to better control the gmsh calculations in order to
obtain the same results ?
Thank you