[Gmsh] Delaunay for quads

[Michel Cassagnes]

Dear Christophe,

Fine! It works with the latest version. I didn't check visually but my
calculation goes to end without any errors. I had tried with the 4.0.0. It
is a recent modification?
I noticed that mesh options have changed. Delaunay for quads becomes
Frontal-Delaunay for quads but remains experimental. Why by curiosity?

Thank you very much and congratulation again for your work.

Best regards,

Michel Cassagnes


Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 18:24, Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at uliege.be> a
écrit :

>
> Dear Michel,
>
> Does this happens with the latest version? If it does, could you share a
> minimal example when we could reproduce the problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
>
> > On 14 Mar 2019, at 22:53, Michel Cassagnes <michel.cassagnes at noos.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am using mesh with Delaunay for quads and then Recombine to get quads
> (and some triangles, I don't need only quads). Resulting mesh seems very
> good but when I use it for calculations, it appears that the mesh contains
> some quads with two edges aligned so unusable and that leads to errors.
> >
> > What can be done to correct this issue ? Is there a parameter to control
> angles in resulting quads that could allow keeping triangle instead if it
> occurs?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michel Cassagnes
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmsh mailing list
> > gmsh at onelab.info
> > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> —
> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20190316/555de67e/attachment-0001.html>