Difference between revisions of "Tutorial/Laplace equation with Dirichlet boundary condition"
(→Zip-file) |
(→The considered problem) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
To simplify, we suppose that the function $f$ is defined by | To simplify, we suppose that the function $f$ is defined by | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2,\qquad f(x,y) = (1+2\pi^2)\ | + | \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2,\qquad f(x,y) = (1+2\pi^2)\sin(\pi x)\sin(\pi y). |
$$ | $$ | ||
As a consequence, the unique solution $u$ of the problem \eqref{eq:problemU} is clearly given by | As a consequence, the unique solution $u$ of the problem \eqref{eq:problemU} is clearly given by | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2, \qquad u(x,y) = \ | + | \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2, \qquad u(x,y) = \sin(\pi x)\sin(\pi y). |
$$ | $$ | ||
In order to solve problem \eqref{eq:problemU} with the finite elements method, we write the weak formulation of problem \eqref{eq:problemU}: | In order to solve problem \eqref{eq:problemU} with the finite elements method, we write the weak formulation of problem \eqref{eq:problemU}: |
Revision as of 15:26, 12 October 2011
Contents
The considered problem
In this problem, we consider a Laplace equation, as in that example, except that the boundary condition is here of Dirichlet type. To model this in GetDP, we will introduce a "Constraint". We assume that the reader has already study the previous example.
As in the example with a Neumann boundary condition, we considered the unit square $\Omega = [0,1]\times[0,1]$ and the unknown function $u$ solves the following problem \begin{equation} \begin{cases}\label{eq:problemU} \Delta u + u = f & \text{in } \Omega,\\ \displaystyle{u = 0} & \text{on }\Gamma, \end{cases} \end{equation} where $\Gamma = \partial\Omega$ is the boundary of $\Omega$ and $\displaystyle{\Delta = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_1^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_2^2} }$ is the Laplacian operator.
To simplify, we suppose that the function $f$ is defined by $$ \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2,\qquad f(x,y) = (1+2\pi^2)\sin(\pi x)\sin(\pi y). $$ As a consequence, the unique solution $u$ of the problem \eqref{eq:problemU} is clearly given by $$ \forall (x,y)\in [0,1]^2, \qquad u(x,y) = \sin(\pi x)\sin(\pi y). $$ In order to solve problem \eqref{eq:problemU} with the finite elements method, we write the weak formulation of problem \eqref{eq:problemU}: \begin{equation}\label{eq:WeakFormulation} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \text{Find } u\in H^1_0(\Omega) \text{ such that, }\\ \displaystyle{\forall v\in H^1_0(\Omega), \qquad \int_{\Omega} \nabla u\cdot\nabla v \;{\rm d}\Omega + \int_{\Omega}uv \;{\rm d}\Omega = 0}, \end{array}\right. \end{equation} where the functions $v$ are the test functions and $H^1_0(\Omega) = \left\{ v \in H^1(\Omega) \text{ such that } v|_{\Gamma} = 0\right\}$.
Outline of the program
The proposed solution is composed by 3 different files:
- param.geo
- Auxiliary file that contains the index number associated with the geometry.
- LaplacianNeumann.geo
- GMSH file, used to build both the square $\Omega$ and its boundary $\Gamma$. Except for the building of $\Gamma$, this file is the same as in the previous example.
- LaplacianNeumann.pro
- GetDP file, contains the weak formulation \eqref{eq:WeakFormulation} of the problem \eqref{eq:problemU}. The main difference between this example and the Neumann case is the addition of the Constraint part, which is located in this GetDP file.
param.geo: the auxiliary file
// File "param.geo" //Numbers that caracterise the interior of the square (Omega) and its boundary (Gama): Omega = 1000; Gama = 1001; // Three remarks on these numbers : // - They are arbitrary choosen. // - They are placed in a separated file to be readable by both GMSH and GetDP. // - "Gamma" is a special word used by GMSH/GetDP, that is why the boundary is named "Gama", with one "m"... // Do not forget to let a blank line at the end, this could make GMSH crash...
Direct link to file `getdp/LaplacianDirichlet/GMSH_GETDP/param.geo'
LaplacianDirichlet.geo: creation of the geometry with GMSH
// File "LaplacianDirichlet.geo". // This file is exactly the same as "LaplacianNeumann.geo" EXCEPT // for the creation of the Physical Entity "Gama" (the boundary), at the end of the file // We include the file containing the numbering of the geometry. Include "param.geo"; //Caracteristic length of the finite elements (reffinement is also possible after the mesh is built): lc = 0.05; // The parameters of the border of the domain : x_max = 1; x_min = 0; y_max= 1; y_min = 0; //Creation of the 4 angle points of the domain Omega (=square) p1 = newp; Point(p1) = {x_min,y_min,0,lc}; p2 = newp; Point(p2) = {x_min,y_max,0,lc}; p3 = newp; Point(p3) = {x_max,y_max,0,lc}; p4 = newp; Point(p4) = {x_max,y_min,0,lc}; //The four edges of the square L1 = newreg; Line(L1) = {p1,p2}; L2 = newreg; Line(L2) = {p2,p3}; L3 = newreg; Line(L3) = {p3,p4}; L4 = newreg; Line(L4) = {p4,p1}; // Line Loop (= boundary of the square) Bound = newreg; Line Loop(Bound) = {L1,L2,L3,L4}; //Surface of the square SurfaceOmega = newreg; Plane Surface(SurfaceOmega) = {Bound}; // To conclude, we define the physical entities, that is "what GetDP could see/use". // Both "Omega" and "Gama" are imported from the file "param.geo". Physical Surface(Omega) = {SurfaceOmega}; Physical Line(Gama) = {L1,L2,L3,L4}; // the Physical Line Gama is composed of the four lines of te boundary (not of the Line Loop !) // Do not forget to let a blank line at the end, this could make GMSH crash...
Direct link to file `getdp/LaplacianDirichlet/GMSH_GETDP/LaplacianDirichlet.geo'
LaplacianDirichlet.pro: weak formulation
// File LaplacianDirichlet.pro // This file is similar to LaplacianDirichlet.pro // Only changes are detailed. // we import the indices of Gama and Omega Include "param.geo"; // Group //====== // We have 2 Groups : Omega and Gama (boundary) Group{ Omega = Region[{Omega}]; Gama = Region[{Gama}]; } //Again note that "Gamma" is a syntaxic word of GetDP // That is why we write here "Gama" and not "Gamma". // (not a mistake from the author :-)) // Function //========= Function{ // Pi is a special value in GetDp (=3.1415...) Coef = Pi; // Definition of the function f(x,y) f[] = -(1+2*Coef*Coef)*Sin[Coef*X[]]*Sin[Coef*Y[]]; // Here f exist on Omega AND Gama. As a consequence, we have to let "f" lives everywhere, // and we let the bracket [] empty. } //Jacobian //======== Jacobian { { Name JVol ; Case { { Region All ; Jacobian Vol ; } } } { Name JSur ; Case { { Region All ; Jacobian Sur ; } } } { Name JLin ; Case { { Region All ; Jacobian Lin ; } } } } //Integration (parameters) //======================= Integration { { Name I1 ; Case { { Type Gauss ; Case { { GeoElement Point ; NumberOfPoints 1 ; } { GeoElement Line ; NumberOfPoints 4 ; } { GeoElement Triangle ; NumberOfPoints 6 ; } { GeoElement Quadrangle ; NumberOfPoints 7 ; } { GeoElement Tetrahedron ; NumberOfPoints 15 ; } { GeoElement Hexahedron ; NumberOfPoints 34 ; } } } } } } //Contraint //============= // This part is new, compare to LaplacianDirichlet.pro. Constraint{ {Name DirichletBC; Type Assign; Case{ {Region Gama; Value 0; } } } } /* The Dirichlet Boundary Condition is here called "DirichletBC. "Assign": type means that it is a Dirichlet type condition "Region": domain where the condition is applied. "Value": value assigned (here 0). */ //FunctionSpace //============= FunctionSpace{ { Name Vh; Type Form0; BasisFunction{ {Name wn; NameOfCoef vn; Function BF_Node; Support Omega; Entity NodesOf[All];} } // Contrary to Neumann case, we had here the constraint : Constraint{ {NameOfCoef vn; EntityType NodesOf; NameOfConstraint DirichletBC;} } } } /* On the constraint: - "NameOfCoef" : a constraint is applied to specific coefficients, here "vn" (in our example, there are the only coefficients because of functions are P1) - "Entitytype" : The constraint is applied on the nodes (e.g : not on the edge) - "NameOfConstraint" : Last (but not least), we have to specify which Constraint is called. With that definition, every function u (even the test-functions) of V_h satisfy the Dirichlet Boundary Condition: u = 0 on Gama. In other words, this spaces approximate the Sobolev space H^1_0(Omega). */ //(Weak) Formulation //================== Formulation{ {Name LaplacianDirichlet; Type FemEquation; Quantity{ {Name u; Type Local; NameOfSpace Vh;} } Equation{ Galerkin{ [Dof{Grad u}, {Grad u}]; In Omega; Jacobian JVol; Integration I1;} Galerkin{ [ Dof{u}, {u}]; In Omega; Jacobian JVol; Integration I1;} Galerkin{ [ -f[], {u}]; In Omega; Jacobian JVol; Integration I1;} } } } /* The variationnal formulation can be read as : search "Dof{u}" in V_h such that, for every "{u}" in V_h, \int_{\Omega} Grad( Dof{u}) . Grad( {u}) d\Omega + \int_{\Omega} Dof{u}.{u} d\Omega = 0 The Dirichlet Boundary Condition is contained in the function space V_h ! */ // Resolution (of the problem) //============================ Resolution{ // nothing change ... (except the name :-) {Name LaplacianDirichlet; System{ {Name Syst; NameOfFormulation LaplacianDirichlet;} } Operation{ Generate[Syst]; Solve[Syst]; SaveSolution[Syst]; } } } //Post Processing //=============== PostProcessing{ {Name LaplacianDirichlet; NameOfFormulation LaplacianDirichlet; Quantity{ {Name u; Value {Local{[{u}];In Omega;Jacobian JVol;}}} // We also ask the computation of the absolute value of "u" and the function "f". //These new variable are called respectively "AbsU" and "f" {Name AbsU; Value {Local{[Norm[{u}]];In Omega;Jacobian JVol;}}} {Name f; Value {Local{[f[]];In Omega;Jacobian JVol;}}} } } } //Post Operation //============== PostOperation{ {Name Map_u; NameOfPostProcessing LaplacianDirichlet; Operation{ Print[u, OnElementsOf Omega, File "u_Dirichlet.pos"]; // Plot of Abs(u) and f Print[AbsU, OnElementsOf Omega, File "u_Abs_Dirichlet.pos"]; Print[f, OnElementsOf Omega, File "f.pos"]; } } }
Direct link to file `getdp/LaplacianDirichlet/GMSH_GETDP/LaplacianDirichlet.pro'
Result
Here is the result obtained with GMSH/GetDP. On the left is the solution $u$ and on the right, the absolute value of of $u$.
All files
A zipfile containing all files (.geo, .pro, .mesh and .pos) can be downloaded here.