[Gmsh] Connecting structured to unstructured meshed volumes in 3D
Octavio Castillo Reyes
ocastilloreyes at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 12:26:40 CET 2020
Thank you for your clarification. Now is working!
In addition, it is possible use only tetrahedral elements to reproduce this
kind of mesh?
Best regards
O.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, 12:19 Christophe Geuzaine, <cgeuzaine at uliege.be> wrote:
>
>
> > On 10 Mar 2020, at 09:01, Octavio Castillo Reyes <
> ocastilloreyes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Prof. Ghristophhe,
> >
> > the error log (including gmsh version) is attached to this email.
> >
>
> The error
>
> Error : Singular value decomposition requires LAPACK
>
> means that your version of Gmsh (that you recompiled from source?) does
> not include LAPACK. This is necessary for mesh generation.
>
> Try the binary versions from the website. I also advise using a more
> recent version.
>
> Christophe
>
>
> > Best regards
> >
> > O.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:40 PM Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine at uliege.be>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 5 Mar 2020, at 09:32, Octavio Castillo Reyes <
> ocastilloreyes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Prof. Ghristophhe, thank you for your tip!
> > >
> > > Right now I have tried it but I have obtained the following errors:
> > >
> >
> > Which version of Gmsh? It should work as-is with recent versions.
> >
> > Christophe
> >
> > > Error : No elements in region 2
> > > Info : Done meshing 3D (0.005192 s)
> > > Info : Optimizing 3D mesh...
> > > Info : Optimizing volume 2
> > > Info : Done optimizing 3D mesh (0.00019 s)
> > > Info : 537 vertices 1236 elements
> > > Error : ------------------------------
> > > Error : Mesh generation error summary
> > > Error : 104 warnings
> > > Error : 105 errors
> > > Error : Check the full log for details
> > > Error : ------------------------------
> > >
> > > In any case, this idea is very good. In spite of this, I would like to
> know if it is possible to replicate this case only with tetrahedra, in this
> way I can avoid using different base functions in my finite element code.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > O.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:19 AM Christophe Geuzaine <
> cgeuzaine at uliege.be> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 3 Mar 2020, at 13:45, Octavio Castillo Reyes <
> ocastilloreyes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear gmsh developers,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to know if it is possible build a tetrahedral mesh with
> following features:
> > > >
> > > > - structured tetrahedral elements on boundaries
> > > > - unstructured tetrahedral elements inside the domain
> > > >
> > > > Could you give some tips/ideas to build this kind of mesh (if
> possible).
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will be done automatically (with a pyramid layer to connect both).
> Here's an example:
> > >
> > >
> https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/blob/master/benchmarks/extrude/hybrid_pyramids.geo
> > >
> > > Christophe
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > O.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gmsh mailing list
> > > > gmsh at onelab.info
> > > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> > >
> > > —
> > > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> > > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> > > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gmsh mailing list
> > > gmsh at onelab.info
> > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> >
> > —
> > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
> >
> >
> >
> > <hybrid_pyramids.err>
>
> —
> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/attachments/20200310/7a2b1d3c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gmsh
mailing list